Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice problem.

Statistics vary dramatically on the variety of medical errors that happen in the United States. Some studies place the variety of medical mistakes in excess of one million every year while other studies put the number as low as a few hundred thousand. It is commonly accepted nevertheless that iatrogenic illness (disease or injury caused by a medical mistake or medical treatment) is the third leading cause of death in the United States after heart disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As a lawyer who has actually restricted his practice to representation of victims injured by another person's neglect, medical or otherwise, I have gotten thousands of calls from prospective customers over the last 20 years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Given that is very expensive and really lengthy the legal representatives in our firm are really careful what medical malpractice cases where we decide to get involved. It is not unusual for an attorney, or law office to advance lawsuits expenditures in excess of $100,000.00 just to obtain a case to trial. These expenditures are the expenses associated with pursuing the litigation that include professional witness costs, deposition expenses, display preparation and court expenses. What follows is an outline of the concerns, concerns and factors to consider that the lawyers in our company think about when going over with a client a prospective medical malpractice case.

Exactly What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Requirement of Care" for medical doctors (or nurses, chiropractic physicians, dental experts, podiatrists etc.) which leads to an injury or death. "Requirement of Care" suggests medical treatment that a reasonable, sensible medical service provider in the same neighborhood must provide. Many cases include a dispute over what the applicable standard of care is. The standard of care is typically supplied through using professional testimony from speaking with physicians that practice or teach medication in the same specialized as the accused( s).

When did the malpractice occur (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of limitations is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the offender dealt with the complainant (victim) or the date the complainant found or fairly ought to have found the malpractice. Some states have a 2 year statute of constraints. In Ohio if the victim is a minor the statute of limitations will not even begin to run till the minor becomes 18 years old. Be advised nevertheless acquired claims for moms and dads may run many years previously. If you think you might have a case it is very important you call a legal representative soon. Regardless of the statute of restrictions, physicians transfer, witnesses vanish and memories fade. The quicker counsel is engaged the faster important evidence can be preserved and the much better your chances are of dominating.

What did the physician do or cannot do?

Merely since a patient does not have an effective result from a surgical treatment, medical treatment or medical treatment does not in and of itself mean the medical professional made a mistake. Medical practice is by no implies a guarantee of health or a complete recovery. Most of the time when a client experiences an unsuccessful result from medical treatment it is not due to the fact that the medical service provider made a mistake. Most of the time when there is a bad medical outcome it is despite good, quality healthcare not because of sub-standard treatment.

Pumpkin Patch Safety Tips - Personal Injury Legal Blogs Posted by Michael John Tario -

If you or your child has been seriously injured on another’s property because of the negligence of the property owner or an employee; you may be able to collect damages through a personal injury claim. Pumpkin Patch Safety Tips - Personal Injury Legal Blogs Posted by Michael John Tario -

When discussing a potential case with a client it is very important that the client be able to tell us why they think there was medical neglect. As we all understand individuals typically pass away from cancer, cardiovascular disease or organ failure even with great medical care. However, we also understand that individuals usually should not die from knee surgical treatment, appendix removal, hernia repair work or some other "small" surgery. When something extremely unexpected like that occurs it definitely deserves checking out whether there was a medical mistake. If in doubt most medical malpractice legal representatives will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. Many attorneys do not charge for a preliminary assessment in negligence cases.

So what if there was a medical error (proximate cause)?

In any neglect case not only is the burden of proof on the plaintiff to show the medical malpractice the complainant should also prove that as a direct outcome of the medical carelessness some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "near cause." Given that medical malpractice litigation is so expensive to pursue the injuries need to be significant to require moving forward with the case. All medical errors are "malpractice" however just a small percentage of mistakes generate medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his boy to the emergency clinic after a skateboard mishap and the ER doctor doesn't do x-rays in spite of an apparent bend in the kid's lower arm and tells the papa his child has "just a sprain" this most likely is medical malpractice. But, if the kid is properly detected within a couple of days and makes a complete healing it is unlikely the "damages" are serious adequate to carry out a suit that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being properly diagnosed, the young boy needs to have his arm re-broken and the development plate is irreparably harmed due to the delay then the damages likely would necessitate more examination and a possible suit.

Other essential considerations.

Other problems that are necessary when determining whether a customer has a malpractice case consist of the victim's behavior and medical history. Did the victim do anything to cause or contribute to the bad medical result? A typical technique of medical malpractice defense attorneys is to blame the client. If it is a birth injury case, did the mother have appropriate prenatal care, did she smoke or utilize drugs during her pregnancy? In , did the patient follow the medical professional's orders, keep his visits, take his medicine as instructed and tell the physician the reality? are facts that we need to understand in order to determine whether the doctor will have a legitimate defense to the malpractice suit?

What occurs if it appears like there is a case?

If it appears that the patient might have been a victim of a medical mistake, the medical error caused a substantial injury or death and the client was certified with his doctor's orders, then we have to get the client's medical records. For the most parts, obtaining the medical records includes nothing more mailing a release signed by the customer to the doctor and/or hospital in addition to a letter asking for the records. When it comes to wrongful death, an executor of the victims estate needs to be designated in the local county court of probate and after that the executor can sign the release requesting the records.

Once the records are received we examine them to make sure they are total. It is not uncommon in medical neglect cases to receive insufficient medical charts. Once all the relevant records are gotten they are supplied to a competent medical specialist for review and opinion. If the case protests an emergency clinic doctor we have an emergency room physician review the case, if it's against a cardiologist we need to obtain an opinion from a cardiologist, etc

. Mostly, exactly what mouse click the following web page would like to know form the specialist is 1) was the healthcare offered listed below the requirement of care, 2) did the offense of the standard of care lead to the clients injury or death? If the doctors opinion is favorable on both counts a claim will be prepared on the client's behalf and normally submitted in the court of common pleas in the county where the malpractice was devoted or in the county where the offender lives. In some limited situations jurisdiction for the malpractice lawsuit could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, a good malpractice legal representative will thoroughly and thoroughly examine any potential malpractice case before filing a lawsuit. It's unfair to the victim or the physicians to submit a claim unless the expert informs us that he believes there is a strong basis to bring the claim. Due to the cost of pursuing a medical neglect action no good legal representative has the time or resources to squander on a "frivolous lawsuit."

When consulting with a malpractice lawyer it is necessary to precisely offer the lawyer as much information as possible and answer the legal representative's questions as entirely as possible. Prior to speaking with a legal representative think about making some notes so you don't forget some crucial reality or circumstance the attorney may need.

Finally, if you think you might have a malpractice case get in touch with a good malpractice legal representative as soon as possible so there are no statute of restrictions problems in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *